QCA Response to ESMA - Draft technical advice on scrutiny and approval of the prospectus

28th September 2017

Email a Friend

Our Legal and Primary Markets Expert Groups contributed to our response to ESMA's consultation on its draft technical advice on scrutiny and approval of the prospectus.

We did not agree that the criteria in Article A(1) determining whether a prospectus is complete was sufficient. We noted that Article A(1) made no reference to the Schedules of Building Books outlined in the delegated act, or the Prospectus Regulation itself, which contains specific information requirements in Articles 6 to 19. 

We agreed that Article A(2) contains appropriate criteria for determining the comprehensibility of a prospectus. However, we encouraged the inclusion of a requirement for technical businesses to issue a warning to potential investors on the cover of their prospectus to seek professional advice before making an investment decision. We commented that this would would have the benefit of allowing retail investment into such businesses whilst ensuring that appropriate levels of investor protection are maintained.

We stated that we did not expect any material extra costs for issuers relating to the procedures for approval and filing. 

Click here to download our response (pdf)

Join Now

  • Gain access to investors
  • Benefit from our campaigns on key policy issues
  • Receive discounts on best practice guides
  • Connect with other members of the sector at our events
  • Stay ahead of the issues with up-to-date news and information
Join now

Newsround

Newsround is the QCA's monthly newsletter produced for the small and mid-cap community.

Sign up